Should i split 10s in blackjack

Klicken Sie hier. Neuer Code wurde an Ihre E-Mail gesendet. Etwas ist schiefgelaufen, bitte versuchen Sie es erneut. Begleiten Sie den Entdecker. Neue Spiele. Millionaire Genie Megaways. Dracula Awakening. Ghost of Dead. Age of Akkadia. ZZ Top Roadside Riches. Smashing Pumpspins. Muerto en Mictlan. Dynamite Riches Megaways.

The Goldiator. Treasure Mine Power Reels. Alice's Spin Party. Book of Dead. Big Bass Bonanza. In Face-up Blackjack, where all the cards dealt are exposed, including both dealer's cards, the correct strategy is to split 10s against the dealer's 13, 14, 15 or For card counters, a situation that favors splitting 10s would be one in which there's a high proportion of high cards left in the deck for instance a high-low true count of plus 6 or more with the dealer showing a 6.

There is one other scenario in which splitting 10s can be the better play than standing. It arises during the last hand of a round during a blackjack tournament. I had it happen to me once like this: While observing the leader's chip count, I calculated that by holding on to a probable winner of 20, I still wouldn't win enough money to overtake him. Mathematically - splitting 10's is a losing bet. That's why it's bad. As for the cry babies at the table that fuss over another players play - tell those babies to go play basketball or soccer if they wanted a team sport.

There are few things I hate more than people who worry about other players play at a BJ table. This game is full of "shoulda, coulda woulda" with or without people making moves that are not by the book. Those geeks just like having someone to blame that's all.

Yeah, don't you just love it when someone waits to see the first card in the next hand, then announces what everyone's hand would have been if you didn't do what you did? Ace Carolla Member Mar 5, Splitting 10's A few days ago I was playing at a local casino and the situation was favorable to spit 10's.

I was playing from the middle position and drew a pair of 10's vs. I split them and drew two more 10s, and stood on both. The guy at third base stood on his Dealer flipped a 10 for his hole card then a 2, for an All of a sudden the dealer and third baseman went into 5 minute lecture on how it was the wrong play and it would cost me in the long run, etc etc.

I just sat there smiling enjoying the sermon that was taking place. Finally, I just said, "Well guys, I guess I just felt lucky. Just wondering if anyone else gets tired of getting advice from other players or dealers. Cardcounter Well-Known Member Mar 7, Why would you want to break a hand that wins more often than not!!!

The reason for this is that you are highly unlikely to get dealt out an Ace or another 10 valued card to a split card which initially contained a pair of 10 valued cards, and the Dealer is unlikely to beat those hands. You will, if you decide to split a pair of 10 valued cards then have to pay an additional stake for the new hand formed with one of those cards, which is going to mean you then are risking twice the amount of money as you originally intended to do.

Plus you may then be dealt out an additional 10 card alongside any split 10 valued card and you could then be tempted to split those cards as well, which will mean you incur an even larger cost by having to place an additional stake on the extra hand formed by re-splitting. One thing to also be aware of in regards to why it is not going to be beneficial for you to split a pair of 10 valued cards is that most variants will have rules in place and also a payout structure that will stipulate if you split any pair of 10 valued cards and one of your split 10 valued cards is then dealt out an Ace card alongside it, those hands are, if they win the game, not going to be paid out at odds of 3 to 2 but instead they will be classed as a standard 21 hand and as such if those hands win the game and beat the Dealers hand your winning payout will be just an even money winning payout.